Int 0190-1998
Business Improvement District Levies
IntroductionFiledCommittee on Financeintroduced 1998-02-26
Filed — closed without being enacted.
Official record · Legistar
Agenda: 1998-02-26Passed: 2001-12-31
Committee on Finance — Executive Budget review and Budget modification, Banking Commission, Comptroller's Office, Department of Finance, Independent Budget Office, Office of Administrative Tax Appeal, and fiscal policy and revenue from any source.
How it compares
94% of similar bills passed
47 passed · 3 died
This bill: 1404 days in committee
Similar bills: median 62 days · 62 days when passed
Compared against 50 Introduction bills in Committee on Finance.
Ranked by how closely each matches this bill's topic — closest first:
Int 0808-2008
Belmont business improvement district.
112dEnacted
Int 0593-2007
Bayside Village business improvement district.
101dEnacted
Int 0691-2005
Establishment of the DUMBO business improvement district.
111dEnacted
Int 1185-2013
BID Assessment Increases
26dEnacted
Int 0452-2004
Fordham Road business improvement district.
88dEnacted
Int 0906-2008
Establishment of the Bed-Stuy Gateway BID.
95dEnacted
+ 44 more comparable bills
Sponsors (11)
Walter L. McCaffrey(prime)
June M. Eisland
John Fusco
Martin J. Golden
Thomas V. Ognibene
Una Clarke
Howard L. Lasher
Jerome X. O'Donovan
Angel Rodriguez
John D. Sabini
Lifecycle
IntroducedIntroduced by Council
1998-02-26 · City Council
ActionReferred to Comm by Council
1998-02-26 · City Council
ActionPrinted Item Laid on Desk
1998-03-17 · Legislative Documents Unit
ClosedFiled (End of Session)
2001-12-31 · City Council
Full text
Be it enacted by the Council as follows:
Section 1. Declaration of Legislative Findings. It is hereby found and declared that business improvement districts represent a valuable mechanism for restoring and promoting business activity within specifically-defined geographic boundaries. It is further found and declared that business improvement districts are primarily a tool to be used by businesses and commercial enterprises to stimulate and improve the business environment within a district.
It is further found and declared that, although business improvement districts are designed and implemented essentially to benefit local merchants and other business enterprises, certain districts within the city of New York have imposed assessments on residential properties that have resulted in a disproportionate financial burden as compared to the benefits received by such properties in return. Therefore, it is the intent of the City Council to prohibit business improvement districts in New York City from assessing a levy on residential properties within the boundaries of such districts.
�2. Chapter four of title twenty-five of the administrative code of the City of New York is hereby amended by adding a new section 25-418 to read as follows:
�25-418. Prohibition of district charges on residential properties. Notwithstanding any provisions of chapters four and five of this title to the contrary, no district charge shall be levied by districts on any residential property within their boundaries, except that districts shall be authorized to levy a district charge on mixed use property, provided that such charge is based solely on that portion of such property used for commercial purposes.
�3. This local law shall take effect immediately.
1
- 2 -