Int 0114-2002
Recognition of marriages, domestic partnerships and civil unions.
IntroductionEnactedCommittee on General Welfareintroduced 2002-04-10Local Law 2002/024
Enacted as Local Law 2002/024.
Official record · Legistar
Agenda: 2002-04-10Passed: 2002-08-27Enacted: 2002-08-27
Committee on General Welfare — Human Resources Administration/Department of Social Services, Department of Homeless Services, and charitable institutions.
How it compares
28% of similar bills passed
14 passed · 36 died
This bill: 105 days in committee
Similar bills: median 673 days · 300 days when passed
Compared against 50 Introduction bills in Committee on General Welfare.
Ranked by how closely each matches this bill's topic — closest first:
Int 0355-1998
Domestic Partnerships Recognized Other Jurisdictions
1265dFiled
Int 0600-2005
Domestic Partnerships
283dFiled
Int 0501-2007
Domestic Partnerships
40dEnacted
Int 0303-1998-A
Domestic Partners
40dEnacted
Int 0163-1998
Domestic Partners
1404dFiled
Int 0454-1998
Domestic Partners, Definition
1166dFiled
+ 44 more comparable bills
Sponsors (18)
Gifford Miller(prime)
Yvette D. Clarke
Eva S. Moskowitz
Philip Reed
Jose M. Serrano
Tracy L. Boyland
Margarita Lopez
Lifecycle
IntroducedIntroduced by Council
2002-04-10 · City Council
ActionReferred to Comm by Council
2002-04-10 · City Council
HeldLaid Over by Committee
2002-06-25 · Committee on General Welfare
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2002-06-25 · Committee on General Welfare
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2002-07-25 · Committee on General Welfare
ActionAmendment Proposed by Comm
2002-07-25 · Committee on General Welfare
ActionAmended by Committee
2002-07-25 · Committee on General Welfare
AdvancedApproved by Committee
2002-07-25 · Committee on General Welfare
AdvancedApproved by Council
2002-08-15 · City Council
ActionSent to Mayor by Council
2002-08-15 · City Council
HeardHearing Held by Mayor
2002-08-27 · Mayor
AdvancedSigned Into Law by Mayor
2002-08-27 · Mayor
ActionRecved from Mayor by Council
2002-08-27 · City Council
Votes (61)
Aye (41)
Bill De BlasioBill PerkinsChristine C. QuinnGale A. BrewerLarry B. SeabrookJose M. SerranoKendall StewartGifford MillerJoseph P. Addabbo, Jr.Tony AvellaMaria BaezCharles BarronGale A. BrewerYvette D. ClarkeLeroy G. Comrie, Jr.James E. DavisErik Martin DilanLewis A. FidlerHelen D. FosterAlan J. GersonEric N. GioiaRobert JacksonMelinda R. KatzG. Oliver KoppellBill De BlasioAndrew J. LanzaMargarita LopezMichael E. McMahonHiram MonserrateBill PerkinsChristine C. QuinnDomenic M. Recchia, Jr.Philip ReedJoel RiveraAngel RodriguezHelen SearsJose M. SerranoKendall StewartAlbert VannDavid I. WeprinDavid Yassky
Nay (8)
Dennis P. GallagherDennis P. GallagherRuben DiazSimcha FelderMartin J. GoldenMichael C. NelsonMadeline T. ProvenzanoJames S. Oddo
Abstain (4)
James F. GennaroMiguel MartinezJames Sanders, Jr.Peter F. Vallone, Jr.
Absent (2)
James Sanders, Jr.Allan W. Jennings, Jr.
Not voting (1)
Betsy Gotbaum
Excused (5)
Tracy L. BoylandJohn C. LiuEva S. MoskowitzDiana ReynaLarry B. Seabrook
Heard at (4)
City Council · 2002-08-15 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on General Welfare · 2002-07-25 · 1:00 PM · Committee Room - City Hall
Committee on General Welfare · 2002-06-25 · 10:00 AM · Council Chambers - City Hall
City Council · 2002-04-10 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Attachments (7)
- Committee Report 6/25
- Hearing Transcript 6/25
- Committee Report 7/25
- Hearing Transcript 7/25
- Hearing Trancript - Stated Meeting - 8/15
- Fiscal Impact Statement
- Local Law
Full text
Be it enacted by the Council as follows:
Section 1. Declaration of legislative intent and findings. Same sex couples have faced many obstacles to full legal recognition of their relationships. The Defense of Marriage Act, Pub. L. No. 104-199, 110 Stat. 2419 (1996) defines marriage for purposes of federal law as the union of a man and woman and empowers states to deny recognition to same sex marriages entered into in other jurisdictions. Unlike the majority of states nationwide, New York State has not enacted legislation denying recognition to same sex marriages. However, the Domestic Relations Law, which governs marriage, does not explicitly recognize same sex marriage or authorize issuance of marriage licenses to same sex couples. In practice in New York State, same sex couples have not been able to obtain marriage licenses and, as a result, have not been able to legally marry.
In 1998, the Council passed the New York City Domestic Partnership Law, which codified prior Mayoral Executive Orders establishing rights and entitlements for City residents who register their domestic partnerships with the City Clerk. The Council now intends to extend New York City's commitment to recognizing rights of same sex partners by revising the definition of "domestic partners" in the administrative code to include persons who have lawfully registered domestic partnerships or entered civil unions or marriages not explicitly recognized by New York State in other jurisdictions, ensuring that such couples enjoy all rights and benefits currently available to domestic partners registered under New York City law.
�2. Section 3-240(a) of subchapter 3 of chapter 2 of title 3 of the administrative code of the city of New York is amended to read as follows:
a. "Domestic partners" shall mean persons who have a registered domestic partnership, which shall include any partnership registered pursuant to this chapter, any partnership registered in accordance with executive order number 123, dated August 7, 1989, and any partnership registered in accordance with executive order number 48, dated January 7, 1993[.], and persons who are members of a marriage that is not recognized by the state of New York, domestic partnership, or civil union, lawfully entered into in another jurisdiction. Nothing in this code shall affect a partnership that has been registered pursuant to either such executive order and has not been terminated in accordance with such executive orders or this chapter.
�3. Subchapter 3 of chapter 2 of title 3 of the administrative code of the city of New York is amended by adding a new section 3-245 to read as follows:
�3-245. Recognition of marriages not recognized by the state of New York, domestic partnerships, and civil unions, of other jurisdictions.
a. Members of a marriage that is not recognized by the state of New York, a domestic partnership, or a civil union, lawfully entered into in another jurisdiction, shall be entitled to all the rights and benefits available to domestic partners registered pursuant to this subchapter. A certificate of such domestic partnership, civil union or marriage issued by another jurisdiction shall constitute sufficient proof of entitlement to such rights and benefits.
b. "Members of a marriage that is not recognized by the state of New York" for purposes of this section and of section 3-240(a) of this title does not include a marriage prohibited by section 5 or section 6 of the New York State Domestic Relations Law.
�4. This local law shall take effect immediately.
12
2