Res 0057-2014
Amend the criminal procedure law in relation to protecting against unwarranted surveillance. (A.2683/S.1841)
ResolutionFiledCommittee on Public Safetyintroduced 2014-02-26
Filed — closed without being enacted.
Official record · Legistar
Agenda: 2014-02-26Passed: 2017-12-31
Committee on Public Safety — Police Department, Civilian Complaint Review Board, and Mayor’s Office of Criminal Justice, courts, legal services, District Attorneys, and the Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor.
How it compares
4% of similar bills passed
2 passed · 48 died
This bill: 1404 days in committee
Similar bills: median 575 days · 203 days when passed
Compared against 50 Resolution bills in Committee on Public Safety.
Ranked by how closely each matches this bill's topic — closest first:
Res 0192-2024
Prohibiting the search, with or without a warrant, of geolocation and keyword data of people who are under no individual suspicion of having committed a crime. (A.84/S.296A)
672dFiled
Res 0449-2022
Prohibiting the search, with or without a warrant, of geolocation and keyword data of people who are under no individual suspicion of having committed a crime. (A.84/S.296A)
375dFiled
Res 0448-2022
Prohibit the use of no-knock warrants, except in certain circumstances. (S11A/A2683)
375dFiled
Res 0056-2018
Repeal the Criminal Procedure Law Article 240 and replace it with a law mandating early, open, and automatic pre-trial discovery.
1430dFiled
Res 1409-2020
Amend the NYS Criminal Procedure Law by strengthening protections for victims of human and sex trafficking. (A.6983-B/S.4981-B)
490dFiled
Res 0979-2016
Safeguards against wrongful convictions by requiring law enforcement to implement evidence-based eyewitness identification procedures and recording of custodial interrogations.
87dAdopted
+ 44 more comparable bills
Sponsors (10)
Lifecycle
IntroducedIntroduced by Council
2014-02-26 · City Council
ActionReferred to Comm by Council
2014-02-26 · City Council
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2015-11-23 · Committee on Public Safety
ActionAmendment Proposed by Comm
2015-11-23 · Committee on Public Safety
HeldLaid Over by Committee
2015-11-23 · Committee on Public Safety
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2015-11-23 · Committee on Transportation
ActionAmendment Proposed by Comm
2015-11-23 · Committee on Transportation
HeldLaid Over by Committee
2015-11-23 · Committee on Transportation
ClosedFiled (End of Session)
2017-12-31 · City Council
Heard at (2)
Committee on Public Safety · 2015-11-23 · 10:00 AM · Council Chambers - City Hall
City Council · 2014-02-26 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Attachments (4)
Full text
By Council Members King, Mendez, Levin, Levine, Espinal, Maisel, Mealy, Reynoso, Rose and Cumbo
Whereas, Unmanned Aircraft Systems ("UAS"), more commonly known as drones, are aircraft without human pilots; and
Whereas, Drones either can be operated remotely through the use of a computer keyboard and a mouse or a joystick or can be programmed to fly autonomously; and
Whereas, Some drones are equipped with a variety of capabilities, including a Global Positioning System ("GPS") sensor, autopilot, and video recording device; and
Whereas, According to a New York Times article, armed and unarmed drones have been used by the United States ("U.S.") for military operations, in countries such as Pakistan and Yemen; and
Whereas, Even though the U.S. military reports that so-called drone strikes target members of various terrorist organizations, such strikes have caused civilian casualties; and
Whereas, A report by Amnesty International states that at least 18 civilians within the area of North Waziristan, Pakistan were killed in just two of the drone strikes in 2012; and
Whereas, In addition to the human toll, drone strikes also have a psychological impact on these communities; and
Whereas, Drones, however, are not confined to military use and are now being used for civilian purposes; and
Whereas, According to the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") website, the agency may authorize limited use of drones for important missions with a public interest, such as firefighting, disaster relief, search and rescue, law enforcement, border patrol, military training, testing and evaluation; and
Whereas, According to a New York Times article, drones are also being used by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to patrol the U.S. borders and ports, and by certain police departments, including those in Miami, Florida and Mesa County, Colorado, which use drones for local law enforcement purposes; and
Whereas, The use of drones raises significant concerns regarding privacy and civil liberties; and
Whereas, The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects individuals from "unreasonable searches and seizures"; and
Whereas, Some groups have argued that the use of drones, in many circumstances, may violate the Fourth Amendment's provisions against unreasonable searches; and
Whereas, The use of drones by police for surveillance purposes has been banned in cities such as Charlottesville, Virginia and Seattle, Washington; and
Whereas, A.2683, sponsored by Assembly Member Luis Sepulveda, and companion bill, S.1841, sponsored by Senator Martin M. Dilan, currently pending in the New York State Assembly and Senate, respectively, would protect against unwarranted surveillance by drones; and
Whereas, More particularly, A.2683/S.1841 would amend the Criminal Procedure Law by adding a new section entitled "Protection against unwarranted surveillance"; and
Whereas, A.2683/S.1841 would define an unmanned aerial vehicle as any powered, aerial vehicle that does not carry a human operator within or on the aircraft and is either autonomously or remotely piloted; and
Whereas, A.2683/S.1841 would prohibit any individual or entity working for, assisting or acting on behalf of any state, county, municipal or local government, from using, operating, engaging, or employing an unmanned aerial vehicle to gather evidence or other information related to a criminal investigation, criminal case, or conduct in violation of regulation; and
Whereas, A.2683/S.1841 would create an exception for the use of unmanned aerial vehicles in instances when authorized under a warrant issued by a court or justified by lawful exceptions to the warrant requirement, such as hot pursuit or in an emergency; and
Whereas, Finally, A.2683/S.1841 would require that evidence or other information obtained in violation of the proposed law would be inadmissible in any criminal action against an injured person and permit any aggrieved individual to seek civil and equitable relief for such violation; and
Whereas, The New York State Legislature should act swiftly to regulate the use of drones; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Council of the City of New York calls upon the New York State Legislature to pass and the Governor to sign A.2683/S.1841, an act that would amend the criminal procedure law in relation to protecting against unwarranted surveillance.
SA/WCJ/JR
11/9/2015 11:55 AM
LS 4932,5041,5069,5178
1