Res 1445-2017
Congress to vote against proposed “right-to-work” legislation.
ResolutionAdoptedCommittee on Civil Service and Laborintroduced 2017-04-25
Adopted by the full Council.
Official record · Legistar
Agenda: 2017-04-25Passed: 2017-05-24
Committee on Civil Service and Labor — Municipal Officers and Employees, Office of Labor Relations, Office of Collective Bargaining, Office of Labor Services, and Municipal Pension and Retirement Systems.
How it compares
44% of similar bills passed
22 passed · 28 died
This bill: 26 days in committee
Similar bills: median 355 days · 43 days when passed
Compared against 50 Resolution bills in Committee on Civil Service and Labor.
Ranked by how closely each matches this bill's topic — closest first:
Res 0240-2018
Acknowledging workers’ gains through the American labor movement.
60dAdopted
Res 1700-2017
US Supreme Court to protect public sector collective bargaining in Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME).
61dFiled
Res 0190-2018
US Supreme Court to protect public sector collective bargaining in Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME).
95dAdopted
Res 0563-2018
Support of #CountMeIn, which seeks to strengthen the labor movement.
1170dFiled
Res 1444-2017
Affirming the right to collectively bargain for workers in NYC.
26dAdopted
Res 0257-2022
Expressing solidarity with unionization drives across New York City’s workforce and affirming the right to have union elections free from anti-democratic union-busting practices.
534dFiled
+ 44 more comparable bills
Sponsors (6)
Lifecycle
HeardHearing on P-C Item by Comm
2017-04-19 · Committee on Civil Service and Labor
HeldP-C Item Laid Over by Comm
2017-04-19 · Committee on Civil Service and Labor
IntroducedIntroduced by Council
2017-04-25 · City Council
ActionReferred to Comm by Council
2017-04-25 · City Council
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2017-05-22 · Committee on Civil Service and Labor
AdvancedApproved by Committee
2017-05-22 · Committee on Civil Service and Labor
AdvancedApproved, by Council
2017-05-24 · City Council
Votes (5)
Aye (5)
I. Daneek MillerElizabeth S. CrowleyDaniel Dromm Costa G. ConstantinidesRobert E. Cornegy, Jr.
Heard at (4)
City Council · 2017-05-24 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on Civil Service and Labor · 2017-05-22 · 10:30 AM · 250 Broadway - Committee Rm, 16th Fl.
City Council · 2017-04-25 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on Civil Service and Labor · 2017-04-19 · 10:00 AM · Committee Room - City Hall
Attachments (11)
- Res. No. 1445
- Committee Report 4/19/17
- Hearing Testimony 4/19/17
- Hearing Transcript 4/19/17
- April 25, 2017 - Stated Meeting Agenda with Links to Files
- Committee Report 5/22/17
- Hearing Transcript 5/22/17
- Hearing Transcript - Stated Meeting 5-24-17
- Minutes of the Recessed Stated Meeting of May 10, 2017 held on May 24, 2017
- Minutes of the Stated Meeting - May 24, 2017
- Minutes of the Recessed Stated Meeting of May 24, 2017 held on June 6, 2017
Full text
By Council Members Miller, Dromm, Kallos, Koslowitz, Chin and Treyger
Whereas, Twenty-seven states currently have "right-to-work" (RTW) laws, including rust-belt states such as Indiana, Wisconsin, and Michigan; and
Whereas, No worker can be forced to become a dues-paying member of a union, but he or she can be compelled to pay "agency fees," which partially cover the costs of collective bargaining; and
Whereas, RTW laws make agency fees optional, thereby creating a downward spiral for unions, which exist to secure higher wages and safe working conditions for their members; and
Whereas, Although federal law requires unions to bargain on behalf of all employees irrespective of membership, RTW laws allow individuals to avoid agency fees while they continue to receive the wage premiums and pension contributions for which unions have negotiated; and
Whereas, As workers are incentivized to leave, it becomes harder for unions to survive; and
Whereas, Union membership has plummeted in a number of states following the passage of RTW legislation; and
Whereas, According to the Wisconsin State Journal, union membership fell in that state by nearly 40 percent between 2010, before the passage of RTW legislation, and 2016; and
Whereas, Michigan followed a similar pattern; and
Whereas, The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) found that union membership dropped from 633,000 Michigan workers to 585,000 in 2014, a decline of 7.5 percent in the first full year under the new law; and
Whereas, Statistics from BLS also indicate that, nationwide, union membership has fallen from 20.1 percent of wage and salary workers in 1983 to 10.7 percent in 2016; and
Whereas, According to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), as unionization has declined, so has the share of income earned by the middle 60 percent of families; and
Whereas, There is little evidence to suggest that RTW laws produce superior economic conditions or increase wages; and
Whereas, In 2016, RTW states had three of the five highest state unemployment rates; and
Whereas, Additionally, according to the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), nine out of the bottom 10 states in terms of per-capita income do not have collective bargaining in the public sector; and
Whereas, Several academic studies, including one authored by Lawrence Mishel, a University of Wisconsin economist, have found that deunionization causes at least 20 percent of wage inequality and that unionization increases wages and benefits, by roughly 28 percent; and
Whereas, A 2015 EPI report found that wages in RTW states are 3.2 percent lower per year on average than wages in other states; and
Whereas, Despite this negative impact on wages, proposed legislation in both the House of Representatives (H.R. 785) and the Senate (S.545) would establish RTW nationwide; and
Whereas, RTW hurts the workers it purports to help by compromising their ability to collectively bargain, and it has not improved macroeconomic conditions; and
Whereas, Implementing it nationally would jeopardize the economic security of millions of Americans; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Council of the City of New York urges Congress to vote against proposed "right to work" legislation
LS#10237
4/7/17
MK