Res 0740-2019
Administration for Children’s Services to implement a policy finding that a person’s mere possession or use of marijuana does not by itself create an imminent risk of harm to a child, warranting the child’s removal.
ResolutionAdoptedCommittee on General Welfareintroduced 2019-02-13
Adopted by the full Council.
Official record · Legistar
Agenda: 2019-02-13Passed: 2019-07-23
Committee on General Welfare — Human Resources Administration/Department of Social Services, Department of Homeless Services, and charitable institutions.
How it compares
12% of similar bills passed
6 passed · 44 died
This bill: 158 days in committee
Similar bills: median 657 days · 288 days when passed
Compared against 50 Resolution bills in Committee on General Welfare.
Ranked by how closely each matches this bill's topic — closest first:
Res 0024-2018
NYC Administration of Children’s Services to fund and Criminal Court Judges to use the Positive Alternative Towards Home program.
1430dFiled
Res 0055-2018
Require drug testing as a condition for public assistance benefits.
1429dFiled
Res 0764-2015
Require drug testing as a condition for public assistance benefits.
919dFiled
Res 0243-2018
Child Victims Act
1379dFiled
Res 0965-2025
Develop a parents’ bill of rights to be distributed at initial home visits in child protective investigations and made available online.
183dFiled
Res 1322-2016
Develop a parents’ bill of rights to be distributed at initial home visits in child protective investigations and made available online.
390dFiled
+ 44 more comparable bills
Sponsors (7)
Public Advocate Jumaane Williams
Lifecycle
IntroducedIntroduced by Council
2019-02-13 · City Council
ActionReferred to Comm by Council
2019-02-13 · City Council
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2019-04-10 · Committee on General Welfare
HeldLaid Over by Committee
2019-04-10 · Committee on General Welfare
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2019-04-10 · Committee on Hospitals
HeldLaid Over by Committee
2019-04-10 · Committee on Hospitals
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2019-07-22 · Committee on General Welfare
AdvancedApproved by Committee
2019-07-22 · Committee on General Welfare
AdvancedApproved, by Council
2019-07-23 · City Council
Votes (8)
Aye (5)
Stephen T. LevinBrad S. LanderAntonio ReynosoRitchie J. TorresMark Treyger
Absent (3)
Vanessa L. GibsonBarry S. GrodenchikRafael Salamanca, Jr.
Heard at (9)
City Council · 2019-07-23 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on General Welfare · 2019-07-22 · 12:00 PM · 250 Broadway - Committee Rm, 16th Fl.
Committee on Hospitals · 2019-04-11 · 1:00 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on General Welfare · 2019-04-11 · 1:00 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on Hospitals · 2019-04-10 · 1:00 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on General Welfare · 2019-04-10 · 1:00 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on General Welfare · 2019-03-04 · 1:00 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on Hospitals · 2019-03-04 · 1:00 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
City Council · 2019-02-13 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Attachments (13)
- Res. No. 740
- February 13, 2019 - Stated Meeting Agenda with Links to Files
- Hearing Transcript - Stated Meeting 2-13-19
- Minutes of the Stated Meeting - February 13, 2019
- Committee Report 4/10/19
- Hearing Testimony 4/10/19
- Hearing Transcript 4/10/19
- Committee Report 7/22/19
- Hearing Transcript 7/22/19
- Committee Report - Stated Meeting
- July 23, 2019 - Stated Meeting Agenda with Links to Files
- Hearing Transcript - Stated Meeting 7-23-19
- Minutes of the Stated Meeting - July 23, 2019
Full text
By Council Members Lander, Levin, Treyger, Rivera, Rosenthal, Miller and the Public Advocate (Mr. Williams)
Whereas, According to a July 2010 report by the Drug Policy Alliance, "Pot as Pretext: Marijuana, Race and The New Disorder in New York City Street Policing," marijuana arrests doubled from the mid-1990s to a peak of more than 50,000 arrests in 2010; and
Whereas, At its peak, according to the Drug Policy Alliance, marijuana arrests constituted the most frequent type of arrest in New York City at a cost to taxpayers of up to $75 million a year and an incalculable socio-economic cost for those arrested; and
Whereas, According to a 2013 report by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), "The War on Marijuana in Black and White," despite comparable use of marijuana among Blacks and Whites, a comprehensive analysis of national, state and county arrest data for the period 2001 to 2010 exposed significant across-the-board racial disparities in the implementation of marijuana enforcement; and
Whereas, The ACLU Report found that Blacks were 4.5 times more likely than Whites to be arrested for marijuana possession in New York State, 9.7 times more likely than Whites to be arrested in Brooklyn and 9.4 times more likely than Whites to be arrested in Manhattan; and
Whereas, According to a 2015 report by the New York City Police Department, "Broken Windows and Quality-of-Life Policing in New York City," the NYPD issued a September 2011 memorandum reiterating state guidance that those found in possession of small amounts of marijuana should be issued court summonses rather than be arrested; and
Whereas, In November 2014, according to the NYPD report, Mayor de Blasio and then-Police Commissioner Bratton issued another order outlining the NYPD's approach to marijuana possession whereby individuals found in possession of less than 25 grams of marijuana would be issued court summonses instead of be arrested; and
Whereas, According to the NYPD report, marijuana arrests declined substantially by more than 25,000 arrests, a nearly 50 percent decline between their peak in 2010 and 2014; and
Whereas, According to an October 2014 report by the Drug Policy Alliance, "Race, Class & Marijuana Arrests in Mayor DeBlasio's Two New Yorks", despite decreases in overall arrests, 86% of the people arrested for marijuana possession in New York City were Black and Latino, compared to 10% for Whites and 4% for others; and
Whereas, According to an August 17, 2011 New York Times article, "No Cause for Marijuana Case, but Enough for Child Neglect" ("the New York Times article"), hundreds of New Yorkers who were caught by police with small amounts of marijuana, or who simply admitted using it, were involved in civil child neglect cases, even though they did not face criminal charges; and
Whereas, Additionally according to the New York Times article, some of these parents lost custody of their children; and
Whereas, The New York Times article stated that the child welfare system was an alternate system of justice for these parents when compared to the criminal court system; and
Whereas, Lawyers interviewed for the New York Times article said they had more than a dozen cases on their dockets involving parents who had never faced neglect allegations but whose children were placed in foster care because of marijuana allegations; and
Whereas, The Administration for Children's Services does not automatically find that a child is in immediate risk of harm if a parent or caregiver possesses or consumes alcohol; and
Whereas, While sometimes parents were allowed to keep custody of their children when neglect had been found, serious repercussions can follow such a finding, such as prohibiting parents from taking jobs around children, barring individuals from being foster care parents or adopting children, and making it easier for Family Court judges to later remove children from their homes; and
Whereas, Since the New York Times article, there has been greater public acceptance of marijuana use across the country, which has led to the legalization of the substance for medical or recreational purposes in over 20 states; and
Whereas, On July 7, 2014, New York became the 23rd state to legalize medicinal marijuana, which act, in addition to decriminalizing the possession of small amounts of marijuana, reflects a growing national trend toward the acceptance of marijuana use; and
Whereas, Given the racial disparities in marijuana enforcement in New York that continue despite this growing trend, there are reasons to be particularly cautious in pursuing civil child neglect cases based merely on the possession of small amounts of marijuana or the admission of marijuana use by parents; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Council of the City of New York calls upon the New York City Administration for Children's Services to implement a policy finding that a person's mere possession or use of marijuana does not by itself create an imminent risk of harm to a child, warranting the child's removal.
LS #s 1586, 2281, 7557, 9297
PLS
2/4/19
3
1