Res 0714-2019
Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act. (S.485/H.R.1230)
ResolutionAdoptedCommittee on Agingintroduced 2019-01-09
Adopted by the full Council.
Official record · Legistar
Agenda: 2019-01-09Passed: 2019-05-29
Committee on Aging — Department for the Aging and all federal, State and municipal programs pertinent to senior citizens.
How it compares
27% of similar bills passed
13 passed · 35 died
This bill: 138 days in committee
Similar bills: median 449 days · 167 days when passed
Compared against 48 Resolution bills in Committee on Aging.
Ranked by how closely each matches this bill's topic — closest first:
Res 0066-2014
Reauthorization of the Older Americans Act.
1404dFiled
Res 0100-2024
Establish an Office of Older Adult Workforce Development within the State Office for the Aging (S.3004/A.6324).
672dFiled
Res 0760-2023
Establish an Office of Older Adult Workforce Development within the State Office for the Aging. (S.3004/A.6324)
108dFiled
Res 0852-2025
Calling on the United States Congress and the President to take steps to protect social security.
187dAdopted
Res 0452-2024
Lower the age of eligibility for Older Americans Act-supported social services and programs from 60 to 45 years for individuals living with HIV.
536dAdopted
Res 0850-2025
Expand Medicare to include long-term services and supports for seniors and individuals with disabilities.
214dAdopted
+ 42 more comparable bills
Sponsors (10)
Lifecycle
ActionReferred to Comm by Council
2019-01-09 · City Council
IntroducedIntroduced by Council
2019-01-09 · City Council
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2019-01-23 · Committee on Aging
HeldLaid Over by Committee
2019-01-23 · Committee on Aging
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2019-01-23 · Committee on Women and Gender Equity
HeldLaid Over by Committee
2019-01-23 · Committee on Women and Gender Equity
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2019-05-28 · Committee on Aging
ActionAmendment Proposed by Comm
2019-05-28 · Committee on Aging
ActionAmended by Committee
2019-05-28 · Committee on Aging
AdvancedApproved by Committee
2019-05-28 · Committee on Aging
AdvancedApproved, by Council
2019-05-29 · City Council
Votes (8)
Aye (8)
Chaim M. DeutschMargaret S. ChinDiana I. AyalaRuben Diaz, Sr.Mathieu EugeneDeborah L. RoseMark TreygerPaul A. Vallone
Heard at (5)
City Council · 2019-05-29 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on Aging · 2019-05-28 · 10:00 AM · 250 Broadway - Committee Rm, 16th Fl.
Committee on Aging · 2019-01-23 · 10:15 AM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on Women and Gender Equity · 2019-01-23 · 10:15 AM · Council Chambers - City Hall
City Council · 2019-01-09 · 12:00 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Attachments (15)
- Res. No. 714
- January 9, 2019 - Charter Meeting with Links to Files
- Hearing Transcript - Charter Meeting 1-9-19
- Minutes of the Charter Meeting - January 9, 2019
- Committee Report 1/23/19
- Hearing Testimony 1/23/19
- Hearing Transcript 1/23/19
- Proposed Res. No. 714-A - 5/23/19
- Committee Report 5/28/19
- Hearing Transcript 5/28/19
- Committee Report - Stated Meeting
- May 29, 2019 - Stated Meeting Agenda with Links to Files
- Hearing Transcript - Stated Meeting 5-29-19
- Minutes of the Stated Meeting - May 29, 2019
- Minutes of the Recessed Meeting of May 29, 2019 Held on June 13, 2019
Full text
By Council Members Chin, Rosenthal, Vallone, Lander, Eugene, Rose, R. Diaz, Ayala, Rivera and Levin
Whereas, The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), enforced by the United States (U.S.) Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), protects individuals aged 40 and older from age discrimination in the workforce, including discrimination involving promotion, hiring, compensation, discharge, and privileges of employment; and
Whereas, Advocates argue that protections put forth by ADEA were weakened by the 2009 U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., which requires that plaintiffs seeking to prove age discrimination in the workforce prove that age was the only motivating factor for the employer's action; and
Whereas, In 2019, U.S. Senator Robert P. Casey Jr. and Congressman Robert C. Scott introduced S.485 and H.R. 1230, respectively, also known as the Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act (POWADA); and
Whereas, POWADA would reverse the Supreme Court's decision in Gross v. FBL Financial Services Inc., by reinstating the "mixed-motive" claim, which permitted employees to only prove that age was one of the factors of an employer's actions; and
Whereas, The American Association of Retired Persons reported that 78 percent of older voters support legislation that protect older adults from age discrimination; and
Whereas, In Fiscal Year 2017, age discrimination accounted for 21.8 percent of complaints made to the U.S. EEOC, with more than 18,000 complaints filed; and
Whereas, While recent research on age discrimination in New York City (NYC) is limited, advocates argue that age discrimination is largely prevalent in NYC; and
Whereas, As reported by the NYC Commission on Human Rights (CCHR), of the 193 queries CCHR received about age discrimination in 2017, 119 of them were related to age discrimination in employment; and
Whereas, According to the U.S Senate's Special Committee on Aging, remaining in the workforce is beneficial for many aging adults, and studies show that working improves emotional, physical and cognitive health, financial stability and security, and quality of life; and
Whereas, Advocates argue that the government should make discrimination laws stronger, not weaker; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Council of the City of New York calls upon the United States Congress to pass and the President to sign S. 485 and H.R. 1230, the Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act.
LS # 8809
5/6/19
KJ