Res 0473-2023
Protect youth during custodial police interrogation. (S1099/A1963)
ResolutionAdoptedCommittee on Public Safetyintroduced 2023-02-02
Adopted by the full Council.
Official record · Legistar
Agenda: 2023-02-02Passed: 2023-12-20
Committee on Public Safety — Police Department, Civilian Complaint Review Board, and Mayor’s Office of Criminal Justice, courts, legal services, District Attorneys, and the Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor.
How it compares
8% of similar bills passed
4 passed · 46 died
This bill: 320 days in committee
Similar bills: median 624 days · 47 days when passed
Compared against 50 Resolution bills in Committee on Public Safety.
Ranked by how closely each matches this bill's topic — closest first:
Res 1378-2020
Amend the family court act and the criminal procedure law in relation to the custodial interrogation of juveniles by law enforcement. (S4980A/A6982)
520dFiled
Res 1067-2025
Requiring a mental health professional be present when juveniles are being interrogated by the police.
97dFiled
Res 0979-2016
Safeguards against wrongful convictions by requiring law enforcement to implement evidence-based eyewitness identification procedures and recording of custodial interrogations.
87dAdopted
Res 0177-2018
NYS Legislature to amend the Penal Law Section 130.05 to include individuals in police custody as being categorically incapable of consenting to sexual conduct with a police officer.
19dAdopted
Res 1717-2017
NYS Legislature to amend the Penal Law Section 130.05 to include individuals in police custody as being categorically incapable of consenting to sexual conduct with a police officer.
45dFiled
Res 1409-2020
Amend the NYS Criminal Procedure Law by strengthening protections for victims of human and sex trafficking. (A.6983-B/S.4981-B)
490dFiled
+ 44 more comparable bills
Sponsors (13)
Lifecycle
IntroducedIntroduced by Council
2023-02-02 · City Council
ActionReferred to Comm by Council
2023-02-02 · City Council
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2023-10-25 · Committee on Public Safety
HeldLaid Over by Committee
2023-10-25 · Committee on Public Safety
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2023-10-25 · Committee on Education
HeldLaid Over by Committee
2023-10-25 · Committee on Education
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2023-12-20 · Committee on Public Safety
AdvancedApproved by Committee
2023-12-20 · Committee on Public Safety
AdvancedApproved, by Council
2023-12-20 · City Council
Votes (10)
Aye (7)
Kamillah HanksErik D. BottcherJustin L. BrannanTiffany L. CabánCarmen N. De La RosaRita C. JosephAlthea V. Stevens
Nay (2)
Joann Ariola Robert F. Holden
Excused (1)
Darlene Mealy
Heard at (5)
City Council · 2023-12-20 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on Public Safety · 2023-12-20 · 11:00 AM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on Public Safety · 2023-10-25 · 1:00 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on Education · 2023-10-25 · 1:00 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
City Council · 2023-02-02 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Attachments (14)
- Res. No. 473
- February 2, 2023 - Stated Meeting Agenda
- Hearing Transcript - Stated Meeting 2-2-23
- Minutes of the Stated Meeting - February 2, 2023
- Committee Report 10/25/23
- Hearing Testimony 10/25/23
- Hearing Transcript 10/25/23
- Committee Report 12/20/23
- Hearing Testimony 12/20/23
- Hearing Transcript 12/20/23
- Committee Report - Stated Meeting
- December 20, 2023 - Stated Meeting Agenda
- Hearing Transcript - Stated Meeting 12-20-23
- Minutes of the Stated Meeting - December 20, 2023
Full text
Whereas, Youth under the age of 18, under certain circumstances, are subject to similar conditions as adults with regard to pre-arraignment detention; and
Whereas, In New York, youth can be arrested, taken for questioning, encouraged to waive their rights, and interrogated using sophisticated tactics designed to draw out a confession; and
Whereas, Reports indicate interrogations can sometimes involve remaining in police custody for more than 24 hours without a parent or guardian or access to legal counsel; and
Whereas, Experts report that brain neural regions responsible for decision making and for managing emotional or stressful situations socioemotionally are among the last to fully develop in youths; and
Whereas, This developmental immaturity reportedly makes youths more likely to act impulsively, make decisions based on emotion, and prioritize short-term rewards over long-term consequences; and
Whereas, As a result, youths are uniquely vulnerable to unknowingly, unintelligently, or involuntarily waiving their Miranda rights and providing unreliable confessions; and
Whereas, Analyses of Miranda warnings indicate they typically include language too complicated for youths to understand, even when written explicitly with children in mind, and the majority of justice-involved youth have serious misunderstandings of at least one critical vocabulary word in the Miranda warning; and
Whereas, Many youths have, at best, a very vague sense of what an attorney does or how having one might be helpful when talking with police; and
Whereas, Even if an adolescent understands their rights, research shows that adolescent brains are too immature to make sound decisions about whether to waive their rights; and
Whereas, Youth are likely to prioritize appeasing authority figures and are susceptible to saying what they believe police want to hear; and
Whereas, According to Behind Closed Doors: What Really Happens When Cops Question Kids, over 90% of youth waive their Miranda rights, and once they do, are substantially more at risk for giving a false confession than are adults; and
Whereas, New York state recently enacted legislation requiring videotaping of youth interrogations, but this is insufficient as a safeguard because recording does not help youth understand their rights or prevent them from giving false confessions, nor does it prevent wrongful convictions based on false confessions; and
Whereas, While New York's Raise the Age law mandates immediate parental notification that youth have been arrested and the location where they are being detained, this safeguard has proven ineffective in practice; and
Whereas, S1099 sponsored by Senator Bailey and A1963 sponsored by Assemblymember Joyner would, among other items, prohibit the police from questioning anyone under 18 before the person has consulted with an attorney and if the child were questioned before an attorney was present, their statement would be inadmissible in court; and
Whereas, S1099/A1963 also requires officers to contact parents before a child can be moved from the location of their arrest; and
Whereas, Youth who have contact with the criminal justice system are disproportionately poor, Black and Hispanic, more likely to have a developmental disability or mental health condition, and be disconnected from school, thus these pressured split-second and uncounseled decisions can have irrevocable consequences that will impact the young person for life; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Council of the City of New York calls on the New York State Legislature to pass, and the Governor to sign, S1099/A1963 which would protect youth during custodial police interrogation.
CMB
LSR#10523
1/27/23