← All bills

Int 0097-2002

Provide employment discrimination protection, WEP & Workfare

IntroductionFiledCommittee on General Welfareintroduced 2002-03-25

Filed — closed without being enacted.

Official record · Legistar

Agenda: 2002-03-25Passed: 2003-12-31
Committee on General WelfareHuman Resources Administration/Department of Social Services, Department of Homeless Services, and charitable institutions.

How it compares

34% of similar bills passed

17 passed · 33 died

This bill: 645 days in committee

Similar bills: median 590 days · 307 days when passed

Sponsors (23)

Joseph P. Addabbo, Jr.
Margarita Lopez
Philip Reed
Jose M. Serrano
Tracy L. Boyland

Lifecycle

IntroducedIntroduced by Council
2002-03-25 · City Council
ActionReferred to Comm by Council
2002-03-25 · City Council
ClosedFiled (End of Session)
2003-12-31 · City Council

Heard at (1)

City Council · 2002-03-25 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall

Attachments (1)

Full text
Be it enacted by the Council as follows: Section 1. Legislative findings and intent. The City Council finds and declares that a federal judge recently decided that Work Experience Program (WEP) workers are not entitled to employment discrimination protections afforded under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because they cannot be considered "employees" as that term is defined under the law. As a result, WEP workers who were subjected to egregious employment discrimination were found not to be protected under the federal civil rights law. In one instance, a noose was draped over the work area of an African-American woman, and in another a woman was physically chased in an attempted sexual contact. WEP workers who have often had to work with little training, supplies or even appropriate clothing are now told by the court that they can also lawfully be sexually or racially harassed on the job. The Council's intent in the current Human Rights Law was that all employed persons, including WEP workers, be entitled to protections against covered acts of employment discrimination. The Council is shocked that the judiciary could possibly consider WEP workers not to be entitled to such basic, federal discrimination protections. Therefore, in order to make certain that the judiciary understands the Council's intent, this local law confirms, in no uncertain terms, that WEP workers and other public assistance recipients in other programs in which they must work in exchange for their welfare benefits are entitled to the discrimination protections provided under the City's Human Rights Law. �2. Section 8-102(5) is amended by adding the following: 5. For purposes of subdivisions one, two, and three of section 8-107 of this chapter, the term "employer" does not include any employer with fewer than four persons in his or her employ. For purposes of subdivisions one, two, and three of section 8-107 of this chapter, the term "employer" shall include any person that utilizes or may utilize the services of public assistance recipients participating in the work experience program, community service, or other workfare programs. Public assistance recipients participating in the work experience program, community service, or other workfare programs are persons entitled to the protections provided under subdivisions one, two and three of section 8-107 of this chapter, provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to limit such other protections as are afforded such public assistance recipients. For purposes of this subdivision, natural persons employed as independent contractors to carry out work in furtherance of an employer's business enterprise who are not themselves employers shall be counted as persons in the employ of such employer. �3. This local law shall take effect immediately. 12 2