Int 0489-2003
Videotaping the use of diversionary devices during a raid conducted by the NYPD.
IntroductionFiledCommittee on Public Safetyintroduced 2003-05-28
Filed — closed without being enacted.
Official record · Legistar
Agenda: 2003-05-28Passed: 2003-12-31
Committee on Public Safety — Police Department, Civilian Complaint Review Board, and Mayor’s Office of Criminal Justice, courts, legal services, District Attorneys, and the Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor.
How it compares
12% of similar bills passed
6 passed · 44 died
This bill: 216 days in committee
Similar bills: median 591 days · 107 days when passed
Compared against 50 Introduction bills in Committee on Public Safety.
Ranked by how closely each matches this bill's topic — closest first:
Int 0329-2002
NYPD to install video cameras in all patrol cars.
377dFiled
Int 0505-2003
Creating the crime of unlawful video surveillance.
208dFiled
Int 0846-2000
Survellience Camera, Installation in Public Places
397dFiled
Int 0635-2005
Creating the crime of video voyeurism.
234dFiled
Int 1235-2016
Respecting the right to record police activities.
535dFiled
Int 0721-2018
Right to record police activities.
833dEnacted
+ 44 more comparable bills
Sponsors (7)
Allan W. Jennings, Jr.
Margarita Lopez
Lifecycle
IntroducedIntroduced by Council
2003-05-28 · City Council
ActionReferred to Comm by Council
2003-05-28 · City Council
ClosedFiled (End of Session)
2003-12-31 · City Council
Heard at (1)
City Council · 2003-05-28 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Full text
Be it enacted by the Council as follows:
Section One. Declaration of legislative findings and intent.
On May 16, 2003, police officers raided the apartment of Alberta Spruill, based on information from an informant that drugs and guns were stored in the apartment. The police, using a "no-knock" warrant, battered down the door and used a diversionary device known as a flash grenade, which creates a loud noise and flash. The police also handcuffed Ms. Spruill, and after looking through the apartment, realized that they had entered the wrong location. However, Ms. Spruill, a city employee and devoted churchgoer who suffered from a heart condition, died two hours later as a result of the fear induced by these police actions.
The use of diversionary devices such as flash or concussion grenades, though perhaps appropriate in certain instances, must be carefully monitored and used sparingly, as the Police Commissioner appeared to indicate by suspending their use after this tragic incident. The City Council finds, however, that should the police once again use these diversionary devices, they should be required to videotape any raids in which the devices are used in order to document the circumstances under which they were employed.
�2. Chapter 1 of Title 14 of the administrative code of the city of New York is hereby amended to add a new section 14-151, to read as follows:
�14-151. Videotaping of the use of Diversionary Devices by the New York Police Department.
a. Definitions. "Diversionary device" shall mean any device, including flash grenades, concussion grenades or any other explosive instrument, designed to stun and disorient.
"Raid" shall mean an intrusion into or on property, including apartments and homes, and includes, but is not limited to, high risk tactical entry or execution of a search warrant.
b. The police department shall record, in its entirety, on videotape of reasonable clarity and audibility, a raid during which a diversionary device is used.
�3. This local law shall take effect immediately.
TB
LS#2548
5/20/03
2