Int 0370-2004
Mandating that the MMR include citizen satisfaction survey responses that will allow the city to properly gauge how residents view the performance of their government.
IntroductionFiledCommittee on Governmental Operationsintroduced 2004-05-19
Filed — closed without being enacted.
Official record · Legistar
Agenda: 2004-05-19Passed: 2005-12-31
Committee on Governmental Operations — Municipal governmental structure and organization, Department of Citywide Administrative Services, Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings, Community Boards, Tax Commission, Board of Standards and Appeals, Campaign Finance Board, Board of Elections, Voter Assistance Commission, Commission on Public Information and Communication, Department of Records and Information Services, Financial Information Services Agency and Law Department.
How it compares
8% of similar bills passed
4 passed · 46 died
This bill: 590 days in committee
Similar bills: median 695 days · 49 days when passed
Compared against 50 Introduction bills in Committee on Governmental Operations.
Ranked by how closely each matches this bill's topic — closest first:
Int 0711-2015
Mandating that the Mayor's Management Report include citizen satisfaction survey responses.
1025dFiled
Int 0085-2006
Regularly updated online performance measures and statistics on city agencies.
1415dFiled
Int 0604-2005
Regularly updated online performance measures and statistics on city agencies.
282dFiled
Int 0248-2006
Requiring that the preliminary MMR and the MMR contain a detailed explanation of the implementation of legislation passed by the Council.
1366dFiled
Int 0570-2005
MMR to report on the allocation of funds and provision of services for each agency, where applicable.
317dFiled
Int 0258-2006
MMR to report on the allocation of funds and provision of services for each agency, where applicable.
1366dFiled
+ 44 more comparable bills
Sponsors (15)
Joseph P. Addabbo, Jr.
Allan W. Jennings, Jr.
Margarita Lopez
Philip Reed
Betsy Gotbaum
Lifecycle
IntroducedIntroduced by Council
2004-05-19 · City Council
ActionReferred to Comm by Council
2004-05-19 · City Council
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2005-11-29 · Committee on Governmental Operations
HeldLaid Over by Committee
2005-11-29 · Committee on Governmental Operations
ClosedFiled (End of Session)
2005-12-31 · City Council
Heard at (2)
Committee on Governmental Operations · 2005-11-29 · 1:00 PM · 250 Broadway - Hearing Room, 16th Fl.
City Council · 2004-05-19 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Attachments (2)
Full text
Be it enacted by the Council as follows:
Section One: Declaration of Legislative Intent and Findings. Currently, the Mayor’s Management Report does not directly gauge residents’ perceptions and evaluations of the services about which it reports. The view that services are best implemented when “customer driven,” has led to the wide use of citizen satisfaction surveys which, when combined with agency data, provide a more accurate view of an agency’s success or failure in delivering those services. Such surveys provide information regarding citizen satisfaction and their reasons for using such services. They identify those needs not currently covered by available services and gauge citizen support for the policies behind the services rendered. Moreover, such surveys can incorporate differences in satisfaction disaggregated by age, race, gender and other socio-economic indices. A genuine measure of efficiency must include not only whether a particular incident or case was resolved, but whether it was resolved satisfactorily.
§ 2. Subdivision c of section 12 of the charter of the city of New York is amended by adding a new paragraph (7), to read as follows:
c. The management report shall include a review of the implementation of the statement of needs as required by subdivision h of section two hundred four and shall contain for each agency
(1) program performance goals for the current fiscal year and a statement and explanation of performance measures;
(2) a statement of actual performance for the entire previous fiscal year relative to program performance goals;
(3) a statement of the status of the agency's internal control environment and systems, including a summary of any actions taken during the previous fiscal year, and any actions being taken during the current fiscal year to strengthen the agency's internal control environment and system;
(4) a summary of rulemaking actions undertaken by the agency during the past fiscal year including
(a) the number of rulemaking actions taken,
(b) the number of such actions which were not noticed in the regulatory agenda prepared for such fiscal year, including a summary of the reasons such rules were not included in such regulatory agenda, and
(c) the number of such actions which were adopted under the emergency rulemaking procedures;
(5) a summary of the procurement actions taken during the previous fiscal year, including: (i) for each of the procurement methods specified in section three hundred twelve, the number and dollar value of the procurement contracts entered into during such fiscal year; and (ii) for all procurement contracts entered into pursuant to a procurement method other than that specified in paragraph one of subdivision a of section three hundred twelve, the number and dollar value of such procurement contracts by each of the reasons specified in paragraph one of subdivision b of section three hundred twelve; and
(6) an appendix indicating the relationship between the program performance goals included in the management report pursuant to paragraph two of this subdivision and the corresponding expenditures made pursuant to the adopted budget for the previous fiscal year[.] ;and
(7) citizen satisfaction survey responses that gauge how the public perceives services rendered by city agencies.
§3. This local law shall take effect immediately.
MT
MD
LS# 628
4/29/04