Int 0222-2010
Timely consideration of requests for evaluation by the Landmarks Preservation Commission.
IntroductionFiledCommittee on Land Useintroduced 2010-05-12
Filed — closed without being enacted.
Official record · Legistar
Agenda: 2010-05-12Passed: 2013-12-31
Committee on Land Use — City Planning Commission, Department of City Planning, Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications, Landmarks Preservation Commission, land use and landmarks review
How it compares
12% of similar bills passed
6 passed · 44 died
This bill: 1329 days in committee
Similar bills: median 624 days · 79 days when passed
Compared against 50 Introduction bills in Committee on Land Use.
Ranked by how closely each matches this bill's topic — closest first:
Int 1020-2009
Timely consideration of Requests for Evaluation (RFEs) by the Landmarks Preservation Commission.
203dFiled
Int 0850-2012
Requiring the landmarks preservation commission to create a timeline for the designation process.
610dFiled
Int 0532-2011
Requiring the Landmarks Preservation Commission to maintain a publicly available database for requests for evaluation.
1000dFiled
Int 0998-2013
Establish a maximum period of time for the landmarks preservation commission to take final action on any item calendared by the Commission.
342dFiled
Int 0849-2012
Requiring the landmarks preservation commission to allow denied requests for evaluation to be nominated to the landmarks preservation commission entire body for a vote.
610dFiled
Int 1034-2009
Nominating a property for consideration by the Landmarks Preservation Commission.
183dFiled
+ 44 more comparable bills
Sponsors (9)
Lifecycle
IntroducedIntroduced by Council
2010-05-12 · City Council
ActionReferred to Comm by Council
2010-05-12 · City Council
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2012-05-02 · Committee on Land Use
ActionAmendment Proposed by Comm
2012-05-02 · Committee on Land Use
HeldLaid Over by Committee
2012-05-02 · Committee on Land Use
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2012-05-02 · Committee on Housing and Buildings
ActionAmendment Proposed by Comm
2012-05-02 · Committee on Housing and Buildings
HeldLaid Over by Committee
2012-05-02 · Committee on Housing and Buildings
ClosedFiled (End of Session)
2013-12-31 · City Council
Heard at (3)
Committee on Housing and Buildings · 2012-05-02 · 10:00 AM · 250 Broadway - Committee Rm, 16th Fl.
Committee on Land Use · 2012-05-02 · 10:00 AM · 250 Broadway - Committee Rm, 16th Fl.
City Council · 2010-05-12 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Attachments (4)
Full text
Be it enacted by the Council as follows:
Section 1. Section 25-302 of chapter 3 of title 25 of the administrative code of the city of New York is amended by adding new subdivisions b-1, v-1, v-2 and w-1 to read as follows:
b-1. “Calendaring.” The process by which the commission determines a hearing date for a proposed landmark, historic district or scenic corridor.
v-1. “Request for evaluation.” The document submitted to the commission for consideration of designating a landmark, interior landmark, historic district or scenic landmark.
v-2. “Request for evaluation committee.” The chairman, the executive director, the chief of staff and the director of research of the commission.
w-1. “Submitter.” Person or body filing a request for evaluation.
§ 2. Section 25-303 of chapter 3 of title 25 of the administrative code of the city of New York is amended by adding a new subdivision l to read as follows:
l. Every request for evaluation proposing a property for landmark designation shall be submitted to the commission’s request for evaluation committee within 120 days of receipt by the commission, and all request for evaluation committee recommendations, whether positive or negative, shall be reported promptly in writing to the full commission.
2. A request for evaluation may be submitted to the commission’s request for evaluation committee within 180 days of receipt by the commission if the submitter is given written notice of such extension within 30 days of receipt by the commission.
§3. This local law shall take effect immediately.
CBH
LS #1732
04/23/2012