Int 0532-2011
Requiring the Landmarks Preservation Commission to maintain a publicly available database for requests for evaluation.
IntroductionFiledCommittee on Land Useintroduced 2011-04-06
Filed — closed without being enacted.
Official record · Legistar
Agenda: 2011-04-06Passed: 2013-12-31
Committee on Land Use — City Planning Commission, Department of City Planning, Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications, Landmarks Preservation Commission, land use and landmarks review
How it compares
12% of similar bills passed
6 passed · 44 died
This bill: 1000 days in committee
Similar bills: median 610 days · 153 days when passed
Compared against 50 Introduction bills in Committee on Land Use.
Ranked by how closely each matches this bill's topic — closest first:
Int 0222-2010
Timely consideration of requests for evaluation by the Landmarks Preservation Commission.
1329dFiled
Int 0837-2015
Requiring the Landmarks Preservation Commission to make available a database of all items designated or under consideration for designation.
918dFiled
Int 0849-2012
Requiring the landmarks preservation commission to allow denied requests for evaluation to be nominated to the landmarks preservation commission entire body for a vote.
610dFiled
Int 1020-2009
Timely consideration of Requests for Evaluation (RFEs) by the Landmarks Preservation Commission.
203dFiled
Int 1034-2009
Nominating a property for consideration by the Landmarks Preservation Commission.
183dFiled
Int 0705-2005
Public designation hearings by the landmarks preservation commission.
136dFiled
+ 44 more comparable bills
Sponsors (13)
Lifecycle
IntroducedIntroduced by Council
2011-04-06 · City Council
ActionReferred to Comm by Council
2011-04-06 · City Council
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2012-05-02 · Committee on Land Use
ActionAmendment Proposed by Comm
2012-05-02 · Committee on Land Use
HeldLaid Over by Committee
2012-05-02 · Committee on Land Use
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2012-05-02 · Committee on Housing and Buildings
ActionAmendment Proposed by Comm
2012-05-02 · Committee on Housing and Buildings
HeldLaid Over by Committee
2012-05-02 · Committee on Housing and Buildings
ClosedFiled (End of Session)
2013-12-31 · City Council
Heard at (3)
Committee on Housing and Buildings · 2012-05-02 · 10:00 AM · 250 Broadway - Committee Rm, 16th Fl.
Committee on Land Use · 2012-05-02 · 10:00 AM · 250 Broadway - Committee Rm, 16th Fl.
City Council · 2011-04-06 · 1:30 PM · Emigrant Savings Bank - 49-51 Chambers Street
Attachments (4)
Full text
Be it enacted by the Council as follows:
Section 1. Section 25-320 of title 25 of the administrative code of the City of New York is amended to read as follows:
a. The commission may make such investigations and studies of matters relating to the protection, enhancement, perpetuation or use of landmarks, interior landmarks, scenic landmarks and historic districts, and to the restoration of landmarks, interior landmarks, scenic landmarks and buildings in historic districts as the commission may, from time to time, deem necessary or appropriate for the effectuation of the purposes of this chapter, and may submit reports and recommendations as to such matters to the mayor and other agencies of the city. In making such investigations and studies, the commission may hold such public hearings as it may deem necessary or appropriate.
b. The commission shall create and maintain at its offices and online on its website a publicly available database listing all requests from the public for the evaluation of the architectural, historical or cultural significance of properties in the city, including the name of the person or organization requesting the evaluation, the address of the property to be evaluated, the current status of the request for evaluation and its resolution. A summary of the aggregate number of all requests for evaluation that have been processed and their status shall be posted.
c. For all final communications for requests for evaluation, the commission shall respond with one of the following four responses: “accepted for further study”; “not recommended for further study at this time”; “need more information from applicant”; or “need 60 more days to respond to request.”
§ 2. This local law shall take effect sixty days after it shall have become a law.
CBH
LS 1732
4/23/2012