Res 0928-2015
US Supreme Court to issue a decision in United States v. Texas that overturns the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in Texas v. United States, and upholds the implementation of President Obama’s expanded DACA and DAPA programs.
ResolutionAdoptedCommittee on Immigrationintroduced 2015-12-16
Adopted by the full Council.
Official record · Legistar
Agenda: 2015-12-16Passed: 2016-04-07
Committee on Immigration — Mayor’s Office of Immigrant Affairs and other matters affecting immigration.
How it compares
40% of similar bills passed
20 passed · 30 died
This bill: 110 days in committee
Similar bills: median 295 days · 25 days when passed
Compared against 50 Resolution bills in Committee on Immigration.
Ranked by how closely each matches this bill's topic — closest first:
Res 0007-2014
Congress to pass a law allowing Temporary Protected Status holders residing in the US to apply for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals.
1426dFiled
Res 1484-2017
Denouncing the termination of the DACA program and calling on the state and federal government to extend protections for undocumented youth by passing the NYS DREAM Act of 2017, as well as the federal DREAM Act of 2017.
207dAdopted
Res 1675-2017
Authorizing the Speaker to file or join amicus briefs on behalf of the Council in litigation challenging the rescission or modification of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
0dAdopted
Res 0708-2025
Condemning President Donald Trump’s threat to carry out mass deportations against immigrants in the United States, and expressing support and solidarity with our immigrant communities.
357dFiled
Res 0141-2014
Comprehensive immigration reform bill that does not include any provisions that would further deny Social Security benefits to undocumented immigrants.
1376dFiled
Res 0804-2019
US Dep of Homeland Security’s decision to terminate the Temporary Protected Status designation for citizens of Nepal residing in the US.
1009dFiled
+ 44 more comparable bills
Sponsors (15)
Lifecycle
IntroducedIntroduced by Council
2015-12-16 · City Council
ActionReferred to Comm by Council
2015-12-16 · City Council
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2016-01-27 · Committee on Immigration
ActionAmendment Proposed by Comm
2016-01-27 · Committee on Immigration
HeldLaid Over by Committee
2016-01-27 · Committee on Immigration
HeardHearing Held by Committee
2016-04-05 · Committee on Immigration
ActionAmendment Proposed by Comm
2016-04-05 · Committee on Immigration
ActionAmended by Committee
2016-04-05 · Committee on Immigration
AdvancedApproved by Committee
2016-04-05 · Committee on Immigration
AdvancedApproved, by Council
2016-04-07 · City Council
Votes (5)
Aye (5)
Mathieu EugeneDaniel Dromm Carlos MenchacaPeter A. KooRafael L. Espinal, Jr.
Heard at (4)
City Council · 2016-04-07 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on Immigration · 2016-04-05 · 10:00 AM · 250 Broadway - Committee Rm, 14th Fl.
Committee on Immigration · 2016-01-27 · 10:00 AM · Committee Room - City Hall
City Council · 2015-12-16 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Attachments (12)
- December 16, 2015 - Stated Meeting Agenda with Links to Files
- Res. No. 928 - 12/16/15
- Committee Report 1/27/16
- Hearing Testimony 1/27/16
- Hearing Transcript 1/27/16
- Committee Report 4/5/16
- Hearing Testimony 4/5/16
- Hearing Transcript 4/5/16
- April 7, 2016 - Stated Meeting Agenda with Links to Files
- Res. No. 928-A - FINAL
- Hearing Transcript - Stated Meeting 4-7-16
- Minutes of the Stated Meeting - April 7, 2016
Full text
By The Speaker (Council Member Mark-Viverito), Council Members Menchaca, Chin, Lander, Mendez, Rodriguez, Wills, Van Bramer, Cohen, Dromm, Koo, Espinal, Rosenthal, Levin and Kallos
Whereas, On November 20, 2014, President Obama announced a series of executive orders on immigration, including an expanded Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program and the new Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) program; and
Whereas, The original DACA program, established in 2012, allows individuals who were under the age of 31 as of June 15, 2012 and came to the United States as children under the age of 16, have lived in the United States continuously since June 15, 2007, and meet certain criteria, to request consideration for deferred action for a period of two years, subject to renewal; and
Whereas, Deferred action is a discretionary determination made by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ("USCIS") to defer removal action of an individual as an act of prosecutorial discretion; and
Whereas, Deferred action does not provide an individual with lawful or permanent immigration status, but approved applicants may receive a work permit; and
Whereas, In order to apply for DACA, individuals must meet certain pre-requisites, including demonstrating that they are currently in school, have graduated or obtained a certificate of completion from high school, or have obtained a General Education Development certificate ("GED") while in the United States, or be an honorably discharged veteran of the Coast Guard or Armed Forces of the United States; and
Whereas, The expanded DACA program would allow individuals of any age who entered the United States before the age of 16, have lived in the United States continuously since January 1, 2010, and meet all other eligibility requirements to request deferred action and work authorization; and
Whereas, The expanded DACA program would extend the period of deferred action and work authorization from two to three years; and
Whereas, The new DAPA program would allow parents of U.S. Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents who have lived in the United States continuously since January 1, 2010, pass required background checks, and meet certain criteria, to request deferred action and employment authorization for a period of three years, subject to renewal; and
Whereas, Reports estimate that under expanded DACA and DAPA, between four and five million undocumented immigrants would become eligible for deferred action; and
Whereas, It is estimated that in New York City up to 121,000 individuals could become eligible for deferred action under the expanded DACA program and the new DAPA program; and
Whereas, In December of 2014, the State of Texas, along with 25 other states, filed a lawsuit against the Obama administration regarding these programs, which has stalled their launch; and
Whereas, In the lawsuit, Texas asserted that the President overstepped his constitutional and statutory authority in executive actions on immigration and that the proposed programs would place a financial burden on the state; and
Whereas, On February 16, 2015, Judge Andrew Hanen of the U.S. District Court in Brownsville, Texas issued a preliminary injunction, which temporarily halted the implementation of the expanded DACA and DAPA programs; and
Whereas, In response, the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") filed an appeal of the injunction to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit; and
Whereas, In November of 2015, nearly a year after the President announced the extended DACA and DAPA programs, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision and continued the preliminary injunction against the DAPA program and the expansion of the DACA program,; and
Whereas, The Obama administration filed a petition with the Supreme Court requesting that it review the Fifth Circuit's decision, with the goal of the Court reviewing the appeal during the current term, which is the final full Supreme Court term of President Obama's presidency; and
Whereas, On January 19, 2016, the Supreme Court granted the Department of Justice's request, and in United States v. Texas (No. 15-674) will review and rule on the Fifth Circuit's decision during the current term ending in June 2016; and
Whereas, The expanded DACA and DAPA programs, if implemented, would greatly benefit not only millions of undocumented immigrants, but the nation as a whole; and
Whereas, The Center for American Progress projects that implementation of the President's administrative relief programs, such as expanded DACA and DAPA, would raise the level of U.S. gross domestic product by 0.4 percent after ten years, which is equivalent to an additional $90 billion by 2024; and
Whereas, Beyond economic gains, immigrants contribute to the fabric and diversity of this nation, particularly in New York City, which has a long-standing history of welcoming and fostering growth among flourishing immigrant communities; and
Whereas, The expanded DACA and DAPA programs will preserve family units in immigrant communities and prevent working families from being unnecessarily separated; and
Whereas, During a time of Congressional inaction on comprehensive immigration reform, swift implementation of the President's expanded DACA and DAPA programs is vital to enhance the lives of millions of undocumented immigrants who contribute daily to this country; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Council of the City of New York calls on the United States Supreme Court to issue a decision in United States v. Texas that overturns the Fifth Circuit's ruling in Texas v. United States and upholds the implementation of President Obama's expanded DACA and DAPA programs.
LS #6826
MA/ IP
12/1/15
1