Res 1675-2017
Authorizing the Speaker to file or join amicus briefs on behalf of the Council in litigation challenging the rescission or modification of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
ResolutionAdoptedCommittee on Immigrationintroduced 2017-10-17
Adopted by the full Council.
Official record · Legistar
Agenda: 2017-10-17Passed: 2017-10-17
Committee on Immigration — Mayor’s Office of Immigrant Affairs and other matters affecting immigration.
How it compares
42% of similar bills passed
21 passed · 29 died
This bill: 0 days in committee
Similar bills: median 230 days · 47 days when passed
Compared against 50 Resolution bills in Committee on Immigration.
Ranked by how closely each matches this bill's topic — closest first:
Res 1484-2017
Denouncing the termination of the DACA program and calling on the state and federal government to extend protections for undocumented youth by passing the NYS DREAM Act of 2017, as well as the federal DREAM Act of 2017.
207dAdopted
Res 0007-2014
Congress to pass a law allowing Temporary Protected Status holders residing in the US to apply for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals.
1426dFiled
Res 0928-2015
US Supreme Court to issue a decision in United States v. Texas that overturns the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in Texas v. United States, and upholds the implementation of President Obama’s expanded DACA and DAPA programs.
110dAdopted
Res 0608-2018
Authorizing the Speaker to submit a public comment on behalf of the Council to the Federal Register, concerning the proposed change to the Public Charge rule.
12dAdopted
Res 0556-2023
Access to Representation Act (A.170/S.999)
252dAdopted
Res 0717-2025
Access to Representation Act, which establishes the right to legal counsel in immigration court proceedings and provides for the administration thereof (A.270/S.141).
47dAdopted
+ 44 more comparable bills
Sponsors (3)
Lifecycle
HeardHearing on P-C Item by Comm
2017-10-16 · Committee on Immigration
AdvancedP-C Item Approved by Comm
2017-10-16 · Committee on Immigration
IntroducedIntroduced by Council
2017-10-17 · City Council
ActionReferred to Comm by Council
2017-10-17 · City Council
AdvancedApproved, by Council
2017-10-17 · City Council
Votes (5)
Aye (5)
Carlos MenchacaMathieu EugeneRafael L. Espinal, Jr.Daniel Dromm Peter A. Koo
Heard at (2)
City Council · 2017-10-17 · 1:30 PM · Council Chambers - City Hall
Committee on Immigration · 2017-10-16 · 3:00 PM · 250 Broadway - Committee Rm, 16th Fl.
Attachments (7)
- Res. No. 1675
- Committee Report
- Hearing Transcript
- Committee Report - Stated Meeting
- October 17, 2017 - Stated Meeting Agenda with Links to Files
- Hearing Transcript - Stated Meeting 10-17-17
- Minutes of the Stated Meeting - October 17, 2017
Full text
By the Speaker (Council Member Mark-Viverito) and Council Members Kallos and Menchaca
Whereas, Undocumented immigrant youth and young adults who were brought to the United States (U.S.) as children and know no other home are often called "DREAMers;" and
Whereas, The term stems from the DREAM Act of 2001, a federal bill that would have provided young immigrants with conditional immigration relief and a pathway to citizenship; and
Whereas, The DREAM Act of 2001 was not passed by Congress and subsequent re-introductions of the bill have also stagnated in Congress; and
Whereas, The Migration Policy Institute (MPI) estimates that, of the 11 million undocumented immigrants in the U.S., between 2.5 and 3 million are considered DREAMers; and
Whereas, Recognizing the need to support DREAMers, then President Barack Obama established the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program through executive order in 2012; and
Whereas, The DACA program provided temporary immigration relief and work authorization to nearly 800,000 DREAMers who met strict age, residency and education criteria, and who did not pose a threat to public safety; and
Whereas, DREAMers, including those who were not eligible for the DACA program, bolster the American economy and contribute an estimated $2 billion a year in state and local taxes; and
Whereas, On June 29th, 2017, the Attorney General of the State of Texas, joined by the attorneys general of nine other states, notified the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of their intent to challenge the legality of the 2012 DACA program if it was not rescinded by September 5th, 2017; and
Whereas, The attorneys general alleged that the program was unlawful, claiming that it was created through presidential overreach; and
Whereas, On September 5th, 2017, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the rescission of the DACA program and the DHS issued logistical guidance regarding the program's termination; and
Whereas, New York City is home to roughly 30,000 DACA recipients who contribute daily to the City's cultural and economic vibrancy; and
Whereas, On September 6th, 2017, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, along with attorneys general from 16 other states, filed a suit to protect DACA grantees in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York; and
Whereas, The suit alleges that the Trump Administration has violated the Equal Protection clause of the Constitution by discriminating against DREAMers of Mexican origin, who make up 78% of DACA recipients; violated Due Process rights, and harmed States' residents, institutions, and economies; and
Whereas, On October 5th, 2017, Attorney General Schneiderman amended the complaint to include a new cause of action that claims the Trump Administration violated the doctrine of equitable estoppel by failing to honor promises made to DACA grantees, including promises that information submitted on DACA applications would not be used for immigration enforcement; and
Whereas, On the same day, Attorney General Schneiderman also added a cause of action that claims that the Trump Administration denied DACA grantees their Procedural Due Process rights pursuant to the 5th Amendment by failing to provide adequate notice about the timeline for renewing DACA status, as well as the termination of the DACA program after March 5th, 2018; and
Whereas, On September 11th, 2017, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra filed a separate legal action, claiming that the Trump Administration discriminated against DACA recipients in violation of the Equal Protection guarantee of the 5th Amendment; and
Whereas, the New York City Council deeply values the contributions made by DREAMers and is committed to defending their rights through advocacy at the state and federal level, as well as by filing or joining amicus briefs that align with the Council's position in support of DREAMers and DACA grantees; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Council of the City of New York authorizes the Speaker to file or join amicus briefs on behalf of the Council in litigation challenging the rescission or modification of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which provides temporary immigration relief to certain undocumented youth.
LS # 11548
IP
10/16/17
2